Powered by .id (informed decisions) for Glenelg Shire
.id community is an evidence base for over 250 local government areas in Australia and New Zealand, helping you make informed decisions.
LEARN MORE ABOUT .idCOVID-19 is a significant health crisis which has resulted in major social and economic disruption across the world. In Australia, the closure of borders (both external and internal) will have impacts on the size and distribution of future population growth. At a local level, the impacts on population growth and demographics outcomes will be felt differently.
.id developed population forecasts for Glenelg Shire in December 2017. These forecasts do not consider potential impacts to assumptions stemming from COVID-19. They do, however, provide a baseline by which to understand where the population may have been without this external shock.
In order to further understand how COVID-19 may impact population growth within Glenelg Shire, we have developed a COVID-19 impact assessment. This assessment is based upon our understanding of typologies (i.e. the characteristics, roles and functions of communities). It demonstrates how these influences may play out across a range of variables, at a localised level. These include:
Glenelg Shire is one of 52 local government areas in Australia that can be classified as a coastal area.
Typical characteristics of coastal areas include:
Based on our understanding of the characteristics of coastal areas, we consider the following to be likely impacts on population growth. These insights are not necessarily specific to the Glenelg Shire, but reflect challenges and opportunities for this type of place.
Low short-term impact from the net overseas migration shock as typically a low share of overseas migrants move directly to coastal regions. Some coastal areas with tourist based economies dependent upon temporary workers may experience a drop in short-term visa holders.
Low longer-term impact as a low proportion of migrants move to coastal areas, compared to metropolitan or major regional cities.
Generally a low impact on future international student residents. While the impact on the number of new international students will be severe nationally, COVID-19 will have a negligible impact in coastal areas which do not contain universities or attract international students*.
Interstate migration will be affected in the short-term, due to border closures and economic uncertainty, coastal areas which typically experience net out-migration to other States will retain more residents, while cities which typically experience net in-migration will not gain as many new residents.
Intrastate migration Typically, coastal areas attract new residents from other areas within the State. This means for some coastal areas, levels of net in-migration may increase, particularly for coastal communities which are in proximity to major regional cities or capital cities.
Births are likely to be fewer in the short-term as fertility typically declines in times of economic uncertainty. Coastal communities with relatively high levels of fertility and forecast births and as a result, may be more impacted.
Deaths caused by COVID-19 are currently at very low levels. This is due to low overall case numbers, however, the number of deaths could increase if case numbers increased in areas with vulnerable, elderly residents. Coastal areas which attract a high number of retirees (and therefore have relatively higher shares of residents aged over 70 years) have a higher mortality exposure when compared with other areas.
Areas with a high share participation and jobs in primary and secondary industries (including heavy industry, port facilities or fishing) may be more resilient to job loss due to COVID-19 domestic impacts currently being more focused around service industries (accommodation and food, tourism etc.) However, in the longer term they may be more exposed to international economic shocks.
On the flip side, areas with a high share of participation and jobs in tourism (retail trade, accommodation and food services etc) may be more severely impacted by job loss due to COVID-19.
Areas that generally have a higher share of retirees will have lower labour force participation therefore less overall resident exposure to any local job impacts.
COVID-19 will increase the likelihood of housing relocation among households who are already vulnerable due to factors such as, unemployment or insecure work, low income, and rental or mortgage stress.
Moving house could affect household formation in several ways including: younger residents moving back home with their parents, elderly residents moving in with their children (as dependants), formation of group households and other larger households to share housing costs. This could also mean that coastal communities may experience some in-flow of previous residents (young and vulnerable adults) who may move back to the family home for financial support, care and/or the increasing ability to work from home.
Availability of lifestyle opportunities including access to open space and natural environment. A large number and diversity of lifestyle opportunities can attract residents to coastal areas.
Access to affordable quality accommodation means that coastal areas could attract new residents from major regional cities and capital cities, which have comparatively more expensive housing.
*Some areas such as Warrnambool which contain university campuses with international students may experience a small negative impact.
Migration is one of the most important components of population change. Net migration explains who will move into an area as well as who is leaving the area. It is therefore an excellent way of understanding housing markets and how the role and function of an area may be affected by COVID-19. Changes to migration may disproportionately affect industries such as the education sector due to their reliance on overseas migration.
Migration | |||
---|---|---|---|
Description | Glenelg Shire | Regional VIC | Potential impact |
Overseas migration | |||
Share of residents born overseas | 7.6% | 11 | Some negative impact |
Overseas migration share of total net migration (2011 to 2016) | -67.7% | 59.4% | Positive impact |
Interstate migration | |||
Interstate migration share of total net migration (2011 to 2016) | 61.8% | -2.0% | Negative impact |
Intrastate migration | |||
Intrastate migration share of total net migration (2011 to 2016) | 106.0% | 42.7% | Positive impact |
International student impacts | |||
Residents attending university | 1.3% | 2.6% | Negligible impact |
Residents attending TAFE | 1.3% | 1.6% | Negligible impact |
The size of the population increases through births and decline through deaths. The number of forecast births is an indication of the exposure the community has to changes to the fertility rate. The share of residents aged 70+ years provides an indication of the exposure the community has to changes to the mortality rate due to COVID-19.
Natural increase | |||
---|---|---|---|
Description | Glenelg Shire | Regional VIC | Potential impact |
Natural increase | |||
Natural increase share of forecast population growth (2020 to 2024) | -35.1% | 28.0% | Negligible impact |
Mortality | |||
Share of residents aged 70+ years (2020) | 16.0% | 14.8% | Some exposure |
Economic vulnerability is an indicator of the degree to which COVID-19 may negatively impact the employment prospects of local residents. Communities with high gross regional product decline and/or high levels of local jobs declining are more likely to experience lower levels of population growth. Additionally, economies with scale and diversification may be more likely to retain, and/or attract residents relative to other areas.
Economic vulnerability | |||
---|---|---|---|
Description | Glenelg Shire | Regional VIC | Potential impact |
Economic output | |||
Gross regional product change | -6.4% | -3.8% | Some negative impact |
Local job impacts | |||
Local job change | -5.7% | -2.7% | Some negative impact |
Local job change (including JobKeeper recipients) | -10.4% | -7.6% | Some negative impact |
Employed resident impacts | |||
Employed resident change | -6.5% | -3.2% | Some negative impact |
Employed resident change (including JobKeeper recipients) | -10.1% | -7.5% | Some negative impact |
Share of residents who work in LGA | 87.5% | - | - |
This indicator identifies communities with a high proportion of residents who have unmet social and economic needs (housing, income, education etc.) Due to COVID-19, these communities, particularly those with a younger, more mobile population, are expected to experience a greater change in how or where residents live (i.e. younger residents moving back home with their parents, formation of group households to share costs or leaving the area in search of employment opportunities elsewhere).
Resident vulnerability | |||
---|---|---|---|
Description | Glenelg Shire | Regional VIC | Potential impact |
Socioeconomic vulnerability | |||
SEIFA Rank (Disadvantage) | 947 | 977 | Some negative impact |
Disengaged youth of 15-24 year olds | 13.8% | 10.6% | Some negative impact |
Share of low income households | 25.2% | 22.9% | Some negative impact |
Housing vulnerability | |||
Share of households under housing stress | 8.2% | 10.5% | Some negative impact |
Mortgage vulnerability | |||
Share of households owned with mortgage | 29.1% | 31.2% | Some exposure |
Share of households under mortgage stress | 9.4% | 10.3% | Some negative impact |
Rental vulnerability | |||
Share of households privately rented | 17.7% | 19.8% | Some exposure |
Share of households under rental stress | 25.1% | 30.3% | Some negative impact |
Residential mobility | |||
Share population of 18-39 year olds | 20.2% | 24.3% | Some exposure |
Local amenity considers the amenity a region provides its residents, with a particular focus on access to affordable housing and access to lifestyle opportunities. It is an indicator of the livability of an area, in the context of COVID-19.
Local amenity | |||
---|---|---|---|
Description | Glenelg Shire | Regional VIC | Potential impact |
Housing Affordability | |||
Housing Median Value | $234,000 | $369,000 | Positive impact |
Unit Median Value | $165,000 | $266,000 | Positive impact |
This page shows the latest version of how COVID-19 may impact population growth for Glenelg Shire. As new information becomes available (e.g. data revisions, additional data sets of relevance) updates will be applied.
Recent updates include:
Given the dynamic nature of COVID-19, revisions will be made to our population forecasts once sufficient data is available.
.id has taken all due care in the preparation of this data. While .id endeavours to provide reliable information and believes the material is accurate it will not be liable for any claim by any party acting on such information. .id accepts no liability with respect to the correctness, accuracy, currency, completeness, relevance or otherwise of this data. Please view our privacy policy, terms of use and legal notices.
DISCLAIMER: While all due care has been taken to ensure that the content of this website is accurate and current, there may be errors or omissions in it and no legal responsibility is accepted for the information and opinions in this website.
Please view our Privacy Policy, Terms of use and Legal notices.
ABS Data and the copyright in the ABS Data remains the property of the Australian Bureau of Statistics. The copyright in the way .id has modified, transformed or reconfigured the ABS Data as published on this website remains the property of .id. ABS Data can be accessed from the Australian Bureau of Statistics at www.abs.gov.au. ABS data can be used under license - terms published on ABS website. intermediary.management@abs.gov.au if you have any queries or wish to distribute any ABS data.